The following items reference official documents and statements, as well as mainstream media articles, that, when considered together, can only make one question the official Covid narrative of a deadly virus:
The PCR test is not reliable
The New York Times article, Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. discusses the problems with the PCR test: depending upon the cycle threshold setting the test can be so sensitive it will find a “virus” in anyone.
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
“In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90 percent of people who tested positive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed negative if the threshold were 30 cycles, Dr. Mina said.”
“It’s just kind of mind-blowing to me that people are not recording the C.T. values from all these tests — that they’re just returning a positive or a negative,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University in New York.
The PCR tests are so sensitive that even a papaya tested positive! Furthermore, the test does not test for viruses. Instead, it looks for indirect evidence that is assumed (with no scientific basis) to be a sign of a supposedly novel coronavirus. And the test has never been proven reliable by testing a PCR-positive person to see if he actually has the virus (which is currently impossible to do because there is no way of proving the existence of the virus besides the PCR test.)
The inflated case numbers – from false positives as well as from counting “irregularities” – go a long way to explaining why cases and deaths do not track each other, as can easily be seen in this graph:
The PCR test has had its day in court and lost. In a ruling that took place in Portugal it was ruled that the PCR test was not sufficient evidence that German tourists were sick and had to be quarantined.
“The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
The World Health Organization (WHO) started the Covid panic with their advice in March, 2020, to “test, test, test” and the resulting fallout. Now, ten months later, after having caused untold suffering as a result of their policy, WHO admits that positive results are meaningless without other considerations:
“Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
CDC: Guidance for certifying COVID-19 deaths
Dr. Deborah Birx summed up the official Covid death counting policy:
“I think in this country we have taken a very liberal approach to mortality.”
– Dr. Birx
So, it is not surprising to see a CDC document guiding doctors to assume deaths are from Covid:
“It is important to emphasize that Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
Only 6% of deaths are Covid-only deaths
The CDC states that in only 6% of deaths from Covid was Covid the only cause of death (the remaining deaths having other conditions also being involved). If you do the math you find that the number of Covid-only deaths are less than the usual expected number of deaths from the flu.
The section Comorbidities of the CDC document Weekly Updates says:
“Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.9 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of mentions for each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups.”
No virus isolates are available
The document CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel (Revison: 06, 12/01/2020) states (on page 43) that no virus isolates are available:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Since no virus was available to the Covid PCR test designers, it should not surprise us that a positive test does not tell us anything about infection, which is also admitted in this document:
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
Later in the document they contradict themselves about whether a positive test indicates infection but they then admit that it could be an infection unrelated to the supposed new virus. Also note that the word “indicative” is vague. Indicating something is not the same as proving something:
“Positive results are indicative of active infection with SARS-CoV-2 but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”
(The document LabCorp COVID-19 RT-PCR test EUA Summary – December 9, 2020 contains the same statements quoted above.)
Dr. Fauci often gets it wrong
Dr. Fauci, in this interview, says there is no reason to wear a mask:
“When you are in the middle of an outbreak wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, it might even block a droplet but it is not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is… when you think masks you should think of health-care providers needing them and people who are ill.”
Interestingly, Fauci published an article about the coronavirus in the New England Journal of Medicine in which he says that, “This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza …”
Thousands of doctors believe Fauci got it wrong with Hydroxychloroquine, too.
The flu is not contagious, according to a US government study
According to The Invisible Rainbow, by Arthur Firstenberg, in 1918 virologists tried to prove that the flu is transmitted from person to person by normal contact. But all such experiments failed. In one experiment, a medical team from the United States Public Health Service tried to infect one hundred healthy volunteers:
“We collected the material and mucous secretions of the mouth and nose and throat and bronchi from cases of the disease and transferred this to our volunteers. We always obtained this material in the same way. The patient with fever, in bed, had a large shallow, tray-like arrangement before him or her, and we washed out one nostril with some sterile saline solution, using perhaps 5 c.c., which is allowed to run into the tray, and that nostril is blown vigorously into the tray. This is repeated with the other nostril. The patient then gargles with some of the solution. Next we obtain some bronchial mucous through coughing and then we swab the mucous surface of each nares and also the mucous surface of the throat. Each volunteer received 6 c.c. of the mixed stuff that I described. they received it into each nostril; received it in the throat and on the eye; and when you think that 6 c.c. in all was used, you will understand that some of it was swallowed. None of them took sick.”
COVID-19—Lessons from History and The Power of “The Terrain”
They say that if you don’t learn from history you are destined to repeat it …
“How much credit should vaccines get for the decline in mortality from infectious diseases? The blunt answer is practically zero. U.S. Government public health statistics show without a shadow of a doubt, that vaccines did not contribute to any significant degree to the decline in mortality. As an example, the rate of deaths attributed to measles had declined over 98% between the years of 1900 and 1963 (some government statistics say the death rate had decreased 99.4%) and was continuing in a downward decline at that point prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine in 1963.”
Science has been corrupted
When the editors of prestigious medical journals are telling you that it is “no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published” we really should take notice:
The Lancet published a study that was unfavorable to hydroxychloroquine and had to retract it.
And then when journalists admit that they have been forced to publish false reports or risk losing their jobs we should also take notice:
Recently, Dr. Ulfakatte went on public television stating that he was forced to publish the works of intelligence agents under his own name, also adding that noncompliance with these orders would result in him losing his job.
Another journalist, Bari Weiss, made waves when she posted her resignation letter to The New York Times.
“But the truth is that intellectual curiosity—let alone risk-taking—is now a liability at The Times,”
So, if the “paper of record” has left intellectual curiosity in the dust, what are they doing … echoing the pronouncements of those in power such as the CDC and the WHO?
German Court: “No Proof That Measles Virus Exists”
Doctors are still vaccinating children against measles, yet, according to the German High Court there is no evidence that the measles virus exists! If the measles virus is a fiction then what else are we being told about viruses that is also a fiction?
Conclusion
The PCR test had its day in court and was found to be insufficient evidence of infection. Deaths are assumed to be related to Covid by decree of the CDC with no evidence. The flu is not contagious. Published science is not reliable. And measles virus has never been proven to exist! It’s enough to make your head spin. But it is pretty clear that, if there is a new disease, it has little to do with a virus.
Sources:
WHO says countries should ‘test, test, test’ for coronavirus
WHO Updates CCP Virus Test Guidelines, Cautions Against Over-Reliance on PCR Test
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
Dr. Deborah Birx summed up the official Covid death counting policy:
CDC Death Certificate Guidance
Weekly Updates, Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
(Revison: 06, 12/01/2020)
LabCorp COVID-19 RT-PCR test EUA Summary – December 9, 2020
FLASHBACK MARCH 2020: Fauci Says “There’s No Reason To Be Walking Around With A Mask”
Lessons from history and the power of the terrain
Skeptical of medical science reports?
World Class Journalist Spills the Beans & Admits Mainstream Media is Completely Fake
German Supreme Court Upholds Biologist’s Claim that Measles Virus Does Not Exist