PCR Test - A Shaky Foundation

Everything that has been done in the name of coronavirus in the last few months is based upon the PCR test. Is it reliable?

Kary Mullis, won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process. He said this about the use of the PCR technology for the purpose of diagnosis: “Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.”

Here are a few key points from the article,The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus:

The PCR technology was not meant to be used for diagnosis.
PCR’s original purpose is to manufacture DNA samples for research by using a process of amplification that successively doubles the amount of the DNA in each cycle of the process.
PCR doesn’t produce a Yes or No result. The more cycles of amplification in the process, the more doubling of the DNA. The number of cycles used is chosen arbitrarily. So, the test could produce much less or much more DNA depending on the number of cycles used. Furthermore, the amount of DNA is on a continuum and the threshold at which point a test is considered positive is also arbitrary.
Even a positive PCR test does not prove infection with SARS-COV2, as this virus has not been isolated.
When you are swabbed for the test your DNA sample is recorded in a government database.
Repeated tests on the same person can result in different results, some of which may be above and others of which may be below the cut-off for a positive result. Sometimes the test is given repeatedly until a positive result is obtained.

So, the entire foundation for the repressive lockdown that we are experiencing is built on the PCR test which was never meant to be a test and which can easily be tuned by the choice of the number of amplification cycles or by raising or lowering the threshold value that defines a positive result. In other words, the lockdown is based on a shaky foundation which they continue to build upon.

If you want more food for thought you can consider that this document from the FDA about the PCR test contains the statement “The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

And if your mind is hungry for an even tastier morsel with regards to testing for SARS-COV2 according to The Atlantic, “We’ve learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating mistake: combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus … The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.”

You would think that since they can define what a positive PCR test result is, that that would be sufficient to produce the number of positive results that they seem determined to find. However, there is evidence that even patients with negative PCR test results are declared to be a Covid-19 case, as this nurse reveals.