According to the scientific paper US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity,” summarized in this article, the Covid vaccine trials have suffered from a serious flaw in methodology. The trials tracked a limited number of possible negative outcomes rather than tracking a full-spectrum of negative outcomes. As the article says, “Vaccines have been promoted and widely utilized under the false claim they have been shown to improve health. However, this claim is only a philosophical argument and not science based. In a true scientific fashion to show a health benefit one would need to show fewer overall deaths during an extended period in the vaccinated group compared to a control group.”
The paper reanalyzes the (publicly available) data from the initial trials for the US Covid vaccines using a criteria of “all cause severe morbidity” and comes to the conclusion “Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statistically significant increase in ‘all cause severe morbidity’ in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.”
While the conclusion applies to all three of the Covid vaccines, the Moderna vaccine appears to be the most problematic and the numbers presented in the paper are summarized in the table below.
Moderna Vaccine
| Moderna | Treated Group | Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Total Subjects | 15,210 | 15,210 |
| Total Severe Events | 3985 | 943 |
It’s apparent that there are significantly more total (Covid and other) severe adverse events in the Moderna vaccinated group than in the control group.
The paper points out there are many adverse events that can not be captured during a time-limited clinical trial. Therefore, the actual number of severe adverse events would be even greater than those reported and mostly appear in the vaccinated group.
The more detailed table in the paper makes a distinction between solicited and unsolicited adverse events. An unsolicited event is an event that the trial was not devised to track, yet was reported by the participants anyway. Presumably, there were others who suffered from un-tracked adverse events and never reported the problem. If the trials had been devised to track such events, one would expect a larger increase in the vaccinated group compared to the control group.
So, there are at least two reasons to believe that the numbers are even worse than presented in the table: first, some problems will occur after the conclusion of the trial and, therefore, not be reported; second, not all negative outcomes were reported because the trial did not look for them.
If this paper is correct, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that Covid vaccines are causing more harm than good.
Source: