The “Vaccines”
These are the events leading to the roll-out of the experimental medical intervention that some refer to as vaccines. Actually, they are a novel medical intervention that has little in common with traditional vaccines.
- Ventilators and Remdesivir were the only EUA-approved Covid treatments
- A war commenced against Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)
- A war on Ivermectin ensues
- The vaccines roll-out in December 2020
- Key players behind pandemic policy admit that the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission
- High profile admissions that the vaccines are not safe
Inexpensive treatments were sidelined for treatments that provided hospitals larger payouts such as ventilators and Remdesivir. Remdesivir is associated with kidney problems that could cause pulmonary edema (the symptoms of which would be difficult to distinguish from Covid).
Perhaps it remains unclear whether or not HCQ is an effective treatment for Covid. What is clear, though, is that HCQ was not competing on an even playing field. A paper appeared in The Lancet that claimed HCQ was ineffective in treating Covid. The paper was soon retracted because the authors would not share the data and allow independent scientists to verify their claims. One wonders why the need to (in all likelihood) fabricate data to malign a safe medication that has stood the test of time. Could it be that this paved the way for the roll-out of vaccines in late 2020?
Three researchers shared the Nobel Prize for their research into the use of Ivermectin in humans. Yet the media portrayed doctors who prescribed Ivermectin for Covid as quacks who prescribed a horse dewormer.
Why would safe meds like HCQ and Ivermectin be attacked? If there was an effective treatment for Covid there would be no need for more lucrative interventions such as ventilators, Remdesivir, and, most importantly, vaccines. Referring back to the Daszak quote it appears that the vaccines were the endgame all along. And why wouldn’t they be when they are so profitable and there is no legal liability to the manufacturers?
Vaccines take many years to be developed and get approved but, lo and behold, a miracle! The new vaccines were approved in less than a year. According to Pfizer’s own documents, more people died in the treated group than in the control group, so, one can only wonder why that was not considered when the decision to approve was made.
VAERS immediately showed the vaccines to be causing an unheard of number of adverse events and deaths, yet, the vaccine gravy train kept rolling along.
Life insurance data showed extraordinary payouts in 2021. Actuarial reports showed excess deaths in working age people of around 200% in Q3 2021 (meaning there were three times as many deaths as expected) yet, the vaccine train keeps on rolling along.
The vaccine trials were not designed to test for transmission. That did not prevent many key players from pretending that the vaccines prevented transmission. It took nearly two years, but, this is now openly admitted – too late for those who were coerced to get jabbed and those who left jobs to prevent getting jabbed.
CDC Director Rachel Walensky, Bill Gates and Pfizer execs are amongst those now admitting the vaccines don’t stop transmission. This is also an admission that vaccinated people are no more or less likely to kill grandma than the unvaccinated, despite massive propaganda saying otherwise.
Dilbert’s creator admits that the “anti-vaxxers” were right. Elon Musk recently tweeted: “I had major side effects from my second booster shot. Felt like I was dying for several days. Hopefully no permanent damage, but I dunno.”
Perhaps, the dam keeping in all the evidence of vaccine damage is about to burst.
Conclusion
No doubt, this chronology has been “cherry-picked” and others would choose different milestones to summarize our recent history. However, looking at this chronology, one interpretation is that we have seen the culmination of a long-planned operation involving what Peter Breggin calls the “global predators.” It’s not ten guys in a room, smoking cigars. It’s many people, organizations and corporations with their own overlapping interests. Legislative action paved the way for immunity from liability in 1986, the Rockefeller Foundation document discussed the “lockdown” scenario in a positive light, Peter Daszak discusses how the profits will follow from the media hype, over 5,000 coronavirus related patents and applications awaited exploitation, and the global predators positioned themselves to profit from forced vaccination.
These three articles can be said to have dissected the idea of a “Covid pandemic,” and what is left on the examination table is the anatomy of the pandemic – an anatomy of fraud, grift and tyranny.
Kary Mullis, the Nobel prize-winning scientist saw it clearly back in the AIDS days: “Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.” And who would know better than Mullis about whether PCR, his invention, was a suitable test for HIV, anti-bodies, or anything else?
Mullis would likely have been a huge obstacle to convincing people that a positive PCR test meant a new virus – SARS-CoV-2 – or even a new disease. So, his passing in the fall of 2019, may have removed the last obstacle to the WHO declaring a public health emergency, and eventually to pushing vaccines as the only possible remedy.
While it is horrible that so many have suffered from these cynical plans, the planners have not succeeded in their goals of vaccine passports and many of their other plans fell short of their goals. The plans of mice and men oft go awry, it’s been said. Let’s do what we can to help that process along so that we will continue to maintain our health freedom.
Read Anatomy of the “Covid Pandemic” – Part I, The Historical Context
Read Anatomy of the “Covid Pandemic” – Part II, The Lockdown